• Blog Homepage
  • CKA Mediation and Arbitration Services Website
  • About Christopher Annunziata
  • Contact Christopher Annunziata

Does Confidentiality End with the Agreement?

Recently, I was able to help settle a particularly thorny contract dispute. Because tempers had flared and there appeared to be some bad blood between the parties, I was concerned about leaving the parties in the room while I brought the terms to the mediation coordinator so that she could type up the settlement agreement. When I jokingly asked if I could leave everyone in the room without the deal falling apart, counsel for one party remarked, “Don’t worry, we have an enforceable oral agreement.”

As I left the room, that seemingly innocuous comment got me thinking. Could the parties call me to testify that agreement had been reached and ethically, would I be able to testify? My initial thought was that upon agreement, the mediation ends. The terms of the agreement are not part of the mediation session. I recalled a similar discussion in my training class, but when I got home, I could not find anything further in my notes.
Further research revealed that the rules set forth by the Georgia Office of Dispute Resolution for court-annexed programs state:

Neither the neutral nor any observer present with permission of the parties in a court-annexed or court-referred ADR process may be subpoenaed or otherwise required to testify concerning a mediation or case evaluation or early neutral evaluation conference or, unless otherwise provided by court ADR rules, a non-binding arbitration, in any subsequent administrative or judicial proceeding. A neutral’s notes or records are not subject to discovery. Notes and records of a court ADR program are not subject to discovery to the extent that such notes or records pertain to cases and parties ordered or referred by a court to the program.

and further that:

Written and executed agreements or memoranda of agreement reached as a result of a court-connected ADR process are enforceable to the same extent as any other agreements. Oral agreements shall not be enforceable.

So, in the context of a court-ordered or court-annexed program, the answer would be a clear and simple, “No.” No, I could not be asked to testify and contrary to the attorney’s belief, no, his oral agreement is not enforceable.

But what about private mediations? The Rules of the Georgia ODR would likely be instructive, but not conclusive. Is the existence of an agreement protected by confidentiality? Can an oral settlement agreement be enforced (putting aside the Statute of Frauds for a second)?

Of course, it would be foolish to allow parties to leave the room without something in writing. But it is common to allow the parties to memorialize the terms in writing themselves, so that attorneys could add all the wonderful boilerplate they feel is necessary. In those cases, I would, of course, create a memorandum setting forth key terms of the agreement which all parties would sign. Even then, however, it might be necessary to clarify some points. Could I forced to testify that the amount was $30,000 not $35,000? Or that payment was due by certified check by close of business Friday, not close of business Monday?

12 Feb 08 | Mediation, Practice Tips

One Response to “Does Confidentiality End with the Agreement?”

  1. Marvin Schuldiner | February 19th, 2008 at 6:33 pm

    I always use a mediation agreement for all my mediations, whether they be court ordered or private. My agreement prohibits any party or their representatives from dragging me into court to breach any aspect of mediation confidentiality. If they do, they will pay me for my time and any other costs I incur and I still will not testify. In NJ, we also have the protection of the UMA.

    As soon as a mediator makes a decision as to what happened (deal or no deal), he/she then has become an arbitrator. And no matter what the decision is, at least one party will be angered. Better to continue to mediate the dispute than become an arbitrator.

©2007-08 Christopher K. Annunziata Legal Disclaimer: The material on this blog is provided for informational purposes only. It should not be construed as legal advice or as creating an attorney-client relationship. If you have a legal question, please consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

AddThis Feed Button
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Alltop, all the top stories
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Interesting Links

  • A Mediator’s Dilemma
  • Above the Law
  • Arizona Mediation
  • better than misery
  • Civil Negotiation and Mediation
  • Cobb Mediation
  • Colin Rule
  • CResearch
  • First Mediation Improvisational Negotiation Blog
  • Florida Mediator
  • Georgia Family Law Blog
  • Georgia Office of Dispute Resolution
  • HealthCare Neutral ADR Blog
  • HR Hero/That’s What She Said
  • Idealawg
  • Indisputedly
  • Larry Bodine Law Marketing Blog
  • Legal Antics
  • Mediate.com
  • Mediation Channel
  • Mediation Meditations
  • Mediation Mensch
  • Mediation Stuff
  • mediator blah…blah…
  • Meeting the Sin Laws
  • National Arbitration Forum Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • Re:solutions – Regarding Solutions Blog
  • Schau’s Mediation Insights
  • SCMA – SoCal Mediation Association
  • Settle It Now
  • Settlement Perspectives
  • Strategic Mediator
  • The Association for Conflict Resolution
  • The Negotiation Guru
  • Volokh Conspiracy
  • World Directory of ADR Blogs
  • Zebra Mediator

Recent Posts

  • Facebooking
  • Some more horn tooting.
  • Georgia Supreme Court Lifts Cap on Pain and Suffering Damages in Malpractice Claims
  • Twelve Angry Men (and Women)?
  • If Anyone Needs a Mediator, It’s These People.

Archives

  • May 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007

 

February 2008
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272829  

Categories

  • Admin
  • ADR
  • ADR Websites
  • Arbitration
  • Blogroll
  • Deep Thoughts
  • Divorce Mediation
  • Ethics and Professional Responsiblity
  • Eye-roller
  • First Amendment
  • Funny
  • General
  • Georgia Law
  • Interesting Legal Developments
  • Legal Websites
  • Lessons from a Mediation Road Warrior
  • Mediation
  • Mediation Blogs
  • My Practice
  • Negotiation
  • Non-ADR Legal News
  • Odd News
  • Personal
  • Practice Tips
  • Rants
  • Ridiculous Lawsuits
  • Uncategorized
  • Websites

Tags

Abraham Lincoln ADR american bar association law student division american electorate Arbitration atlanta attorneys barack obama Blog blogosphere blogs Brian Herrington campaign law CKA Mediation decision maker defense counsel dispute dispute resolution divorce e pluribus unum fiscal responsibility georgia georgia office of dispute resolution good stuff john fitzgerald kennedy lawyer litigation Mediation mediation advocacy mediation services mediator mediators national arbitration forum Negotiation negotiation competition perspective president elect rss reader settlement small claims court tina fey Upchurch Watson White & Max Vickie Pynchon volokh volunteer judges

© CKA Mediation and Arbitration Blog · RSS Feed
Design by Luka Cvrk · Wordpressed by Ericulous
Inspired by Ecommerce Web Hosting, Ringtones and Marketing